PrintShare
Export citation
Text size Increase font sizeDecrease font size
Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment

iconEncyclopedia

Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment

David Levinson

Pub. date: 2002 | Online Pub. Date: September 15, 2007 | DOI: 10.4135/9781412950664 | Print ISBN: 9780761922582 | Online ISBN: 9781412950664| Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc.

About this encyclopedia
Text size

Prisoner Rights

Joycelyn M. Pollock

After a person has been found guilty and sentenced to prison, many people assume that the person has (or should have) no rights. Until the 1960s this was, to some extent, true. Federal and state courts refused to hear “prisoner rights” cases or decided such cases in a way that made it clear that prisoners had few, if any, of the rights of free people. In Ruffin v. Commonwealth (1871), for example, the Virginia Supreme Court stated that inmates were a “slave of the state” with only those rights that the state chose to give them. In contrast, the opinion that prisoners have not lost all of their constitutional rights is voiced, for instance, by the Supreme Court in Wolff v. McDonnell (1974): “There is no iron curtain drawn between the Constitution and the prisons of this country.” During the so-called Warren Court era between 1953 and 1969, named after ...

Users without subscription are not able to see the full content on this title. Please, subscribe or login to access all content on this website.