PrintShare
Text size Increase font sizeDecrease font size
Encyclopedia of Epidemiology

iconEncyclopedia

Encyclopedia of Epidemiology

Sarah Boslaugh

Pub. date: 2008 | Online Pub. Date: November 27, 2007 | DOI: 10.4135/9781412953948 | Print ISBN: 9781412928168 | Online ISBN: 9781412953948 | Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc.

About this encyclopedia
PrintShare
Text size Increase font sizeDecrease font size
Text size

Bias

Louise-Anne McNutt & Allison Krug & Colleen McLaughlin

Error happens. Scales are set incorrectly. Memories fade. Study participants try to give the ‘right’ answer. When these mistakes are systematic, that is, not random, they will likely cause a biased result. The term bias can be translated fairly as ‘wrong’ with the additional refinement of ‘wrong due to systematic error.’ Thus, in the general statistical and scientific languages, a biased estimate is an incorrect estimate. In epidemiology, biased estimates typically refer to the distortion of a measure of association between exposure and outcome. This entry describes these measures, including the rate ratio, relative risk, attributable risk, and odds ratio. The following examples will help illustrate bias. Underestimation would be caused by a scale that always weighs people 10 lb less than their true weight. A survey with leading questions (e.g., ‘Do you believe that smoking is bad?’) may draw the desired answers more frequently than the study population actually ...

Users without subscription are not able to see the full content on this title. Please, subscribe or login to access all content on this website.